Showing posts with label 专题特稿. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 专题特稿. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Tales of A Tiger Mother

Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother by Amy Chua.
Despite the initial backlash her book received, Amy Chua is proud of the way she has raised her two kids
By Dora Cheok

Amy Chua’s memoir, Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, has captured the attention of parents all across the United States of America. Controversy has surrounded the author ever since an excerpt of her book about strict Asian parenting was published in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year. The book has topped bestseller lists around the world and is responsible for an explosion of, at times, ferocious debates and discussions over parenting styles.

Amy tells Reader’s Digest Asia that she’s a little bewildered about how her book has struck so many nerves in the US.
Tiger Mom: Amy Chua
Reader’s Digest: Did you want your book to be controversial?

Amy Chua: No. I did not think it would be. I thought it was going to be much more universal because it’s a memoir about struggles all parents have. I don’t think it would have been controversial at all if it wasn’t for the Wall Street Journal headline that was called, “Why Chinese Mothers are Superior”. I don’t think people would have gotten upset over one person’s story. In fact, now that people are actually starting to read the book, I’m getting lovely e-mails from people who say, “Oh I was so mad at you after reading the Wall Street Journal article, but now that I’ve read the whole book, I love it”.

We all want to raise happy kids. We all have different ideas on how we want to do this. We all make mistakes and hopefully try to learn from them. I knew it would be a little provocative, but I certainly didn’t think it was going to be like this. My Dad said, “Oh Amy, nobody’s going to read this book. You’re not a famous person, why would anyone want to read your memoir!”


What do your parents think about the entire furore created by your book?

You can’t believe how wonderful my parents are. Before I published the book, my mother told me how un-Chinese the book was because it was so personal. But she actually loved the book. I would have never published the book if anyone in my family had been upset with it. This is the Asian part of me. My mother, father, three sisters, two daughters and my husband cleared every single line.

But my mother is right – a Chinese person would never publish [this book]. It’s so public. I think that Chinese people are much more private. Now that the book is out, my parents are the biggest supporters. I’m so lucky to have such supportive parents. They have encouraged me throughout all of this. My Dad said to me that someday people are going to realise how it’s changing the international dialogue. He’s very proud of me.


In your book you say, “You have to be hated sometimes by someone you love . . . and there’s just no letting up, no point where at which it suddenly becomes easy”. These sentiments are echoed by many mothers across Asia. There’s still very much the belief here that sparing the rod will lead to a spoilt child. What’s your view on really strict parenting?

I think a lot of Western parents don’t want to be hated. The prospect terrifies them. To Westerners, my book is saying, “Look, it’s not so bad to be a little strict and not give your kids too many choices”. In the west, there’s so much emphasis on creativity and freedom and letting your kids do whatever they want. But in countries like Singapore, China and Korea, where in some ways the normal upbringing is already very strict, the message of my book is sort of the opposite, that you shouldn’t be that strict.

My children grew up with one Western parent. My husband doesn’t believe in raising his voice with the kids and we don’t spank. They were really raised in a half Asian family. My book’s message is that we should try to find the balance. I believe that when children are little, you should restrict their choices. I like the traditional Chinese way. Respect authority and don’t just let them watch TV all the time. I don’t think kids under the age of ten can make good choices. I don’t think you can let kids who are five or six pursue their passions because that would mean they would be playing video games all day. But once they start to get older, the lesson I learnt with Lulu (Amy’s second daughter) is that you have to start listening to them. You have to start giving them more choices and more freedom. I really think it’s important to find a balance.

Sometimes I think we’re too strict about the choices we give them. When I was little, my parents really only wanted me to be a scientist or a doctor; they had never even heard of law school. I think even these days if you were to tell your mother you want to be a fashion designer, or an artist or a writer, a lot of Asian parents would be alarmed because they don’t think that’s a secure career. I like the strict Chinese way of discipline, hard work and academics when children are young. But when they’re older, you have to convey love to your child, you have to listen to your child and really strike that balance between creativity, choice and freedom on the one hand, which the west is very good at, and on the other hand, drilling, hard work and self discipline, which I think traditional Chinese parenting is very good at.
Amy Chua's family
The family today with their Samoyeds. Photo: Amy Chua
Academically, Asian students are outperforming their American counterparts on all levels. However, as adults, we’re finding ourselves falling short in the areas of creativity and the ability to influence others and successful people are those who know how to influence others. And that’s the part that’s emphasised in a Western upbringing.

Yes. A Western upbringing tends to stress questioning authority, which is always asking why, why, why. A teacher will give an assignment and the way my husband and I react is very different. I will say, “Do everything the teacher says. Don’t question it, just do it.” Whereas my husband would say, “Why are they asking that question? That’s such a stupid question.” I think striking the best of both worlds is really what the book should stand for.

I think the Western emphasis on creativity may have gone too far. You give a little kid a piece of paper and say, “Hey, be creative”. I think that doesn’t make sense because you need to have the foundations first. I think it’s really silly to say, “Oh, let’s be creative with Maths.” Of course, you need to know how to multiply and divide and do all the basics first. On the other hand, in Asia, there’s too much emphasis on memorisation and drilling. I find that my Asian students in law school have trouble coming up with creative paper ideas.


Why do you think there was so much initial backlash about expecting nothing less than the best from your child? You say this again and again – don’t think your child can’t achieve. Here in Asia, that’s a given. Why score a ‘B’ when you can get an ‘A’?

I know! I’m shocked. I’ve been so surprised. My parents came to the US and they always told me that this is the land of opportunity. This is the country where you should try your best and you have to strive for excellence. I would say that actually half the people in the US, now that they’ve read the book, actually agree with me. But I think the first reason for the backlash is that there was a lot of misunderstanding in the west by people who have not actually read the book. When they saw the Wall Street Journal article, they got really defensive and angry. They didn’t realise the book is a memoir and they didn’t realise that the book is supposed to be funny. That list (see box), which is supposed to be tongue-in-cheek and ironic, was completely misinterpreted.

The second reason I think is that there’s so a lot of insecurity in the west right now about China rising and whether the shift of power is moving to Asia. Coincidently, that article came out the week that the president of China was visiting the US. It was also the week when the OECD’s Program for International Student Assessment results were disclosed. Asian countries like China, Hong Kong, Korea and Singapore topped science, reading and mathematics scores. The United States came in 17th in science, 14th in reading and 25th in mathematics.

I think I tapped into a double insecurity. Firstly, about the concerns of Asia rising and America falling and secondly, an insecurity we all have – are we doing the right thing with our kids? In the west, it’s not the case that all our kids are happy. There are very high rates of depression, teens on medication, and low self-esteem. There are lots of kids who do drugs and teenagers getting pregnant. There’s a real worry about our children and the timing sort of created this explosion. I was shocked. I went around trying to explain. I felt very misunderstood. I’m proud of the way I raised my kids but I do believe that there are many good ways of raising children. My husband came out great and he was raised by a very liberal family.


How have Sophia and Lulu handled this?

Much better than I have. My kids are so strong. Their friends and teachers have supported them. They are able to go look on the Internet – I can’t – and find all these nice things and say, “Don’t worry, here’s a good one Mummy”.

I find it incredibly unfair. Some parents let their kids sleep at other people’s houses, where they drink alcohol, watch TV for hours and God knows what else. But if you say you have to get all ‘As’ and practice the violin for two hours, then they consider that abusive. That upsets me. My kids grew up in a loving household. My kids and I are very close. I wonder if some of the permissive parents who are criticising me are even close to their kids. My kids have been 100 percent supportive. There were some very harsh words directed at me. And it’s because of my children and my husband, my parents and sisters, that I was able to pull through. In some ways, I think this is evidence in favour of how I’ve raised my kids that they supported me so well.
Amy Chua and the girls
Baking with the girls when they're young. Photo: Amy Chua
Do you think it’s because you’ve spent so much time with your kids? Is that something that’s missing from Western parenting?

I think it’s something that’s missing from some Western parenting, but I wouldn’t say all. I got so many e-mails from Western parents saying they were very strict, how they’d do homework with their children and how they thought an ‘A minus’ wasn’t good enough either. There are a lot of Western parents that actually parent the same way I do.

But there’s also a significant proportion of the population, maybe more than half, that are much more permissive and they also don’t do the work. They don’t sit down with their kids. They tell them to go run and explore. Go have a play date. Go have a sleepover. And then they attack me for not letting them have a sleepover.

It’s so much easier to let your child have a sleepover. You send them to someone else’s house for eight hours instead of spending that time with them. My kids are often mad at me. But I also know that deep down they know the amount of effort and sacrifice I put in.


Battle Hymn is a very personal affair between yourself and your daughters. How does your husband fit into this?

My husband is an incredibly strong personality. He didn’t want to be a prominent character in my book, partly because he is such a strong person. My husband was always there in the background, asserting his views. He would say, “OK, our kids will do two hours of violin practice, but on the weekends we are going to the lake. We are going hiking.” I think my kids were raised openly with an emphasis on exploration. I hate dangerous things like scuba diving or skydiving. My husband has always made our kids do those things. He was a very strong presence in bringing balance to the family.

We never really had fights when the kids were young because he agreed with me that we should be strict. My husband loved his family but he regretted that his own parents weren’t stricter with him. For example my husband doesn’t play a musical instrument. He can’t read music very well. He wishes that he had been made to learn a musical instrument. He also wishes that somebody would have forced him to pick up a second language. As an adult, it’s very difficult to learn a second language. My kids speak fluent Mandarin and he supported me with this. When my daughter Lulu rebelled, my husband was the one that stepped in and said that something had changed and that we had to make some adjustments. I was very lucky that together we prevented a crisis.

From: Reader's Digest Asia : Tales of A Tiger Mother

Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother (Chinese Edition)《我在美国做妈妈》


Sharing is caring

Thursday, March 22, 2012

三分教诲 七分等待——教育专家关鸿羽的家庭教育“辩证法”

编者按:教育是一项系统工程。它包含家庭教育、社会教育、学校教育,三者相互关联,不可或缺,而家庭教育又是一切教育的基础。前苏联教育学家苏霍姆林斯基曾把儿童比作一块大理石。他认为把这块大理石塑造成一座雕像需要的第一位雕塑家就是家庭。
哪怕98%是表扬与鼓励
也要给批评留2%的位置
问:前一阶段有人提出“赏识教育”这一新概念,伴随而来的还有一个口号:“好孩子是夸出来的。”您是否赞同这种看法呢?
关鸿羽:这个观点是不全面的。教育必须讲究辩证法,不能提极端的口号。我赞成多赏识、多表扬、多鼓励,但是好孩子不是夸出来的,而是综合教育的结果,其中包括家庭教育、学校教育、社会影响。家庭教育包括家长身教、家庭环境、教育方法,而这方法中有表扬也有批评。无原则的表扬不仅不利于孩子成长,还容易使其骄傲自满,心理承受能力降低,以至于不适应将来的社会。
问:也就是说,发现了孩子的缺点,不能熟视无睹、听之任之,要给以必要的教育甚至惩罚?
关鸿羽:对,也就是负强化。一个没有受过批评和委屈的孩子是很难成才的。负面教育的重要作用在于,它可以使孩子认识到什么是不能做的,并及时调整自己的行动。孩子需要表扬也需要批评,我的观点是:表扬为主,批评为辅;严爱结合,刚柔相济。哪怕98%是表扬与鼓励,也要给批评留2%的位置。
相近的思想相吸
相反的思想相斥
问:家长和孩子之间由于年龄差距较大,往往具有很深的代沟与隔膜,在思想上不容易彼此理解和沟通。对此您有什么好的办法?
关鸿羽:以孩子的眼光看待孩子,永远保持一颗童心,是当家长最重要的原则之一。有些家长总想让孩子“规规矩矩”,总想把他们变成个“小大人”,这种脱离年龄特点的教育往往造成两代人的隔阂。“将心比心”,遇到问题替孩子设身处地想一想,就会好得多。
问:父母由于对子女过高的期望值而提出过高的标准和要求,是否也可以用您的“阶梯理论”来化解?
关鸿羽:不错。教育中有一个现象,叫做“相近的思想相吸,相反的思想相斥”。你的观点离孩子很远,不容易被孩子接受;你的观点和孩子相近,孩子自然容易接受。因此,家长要先降低标准,找到与孩子相近的地方进行疏导。这就如同上台阶,你想把孩子拉上台阶,你先要走下去,贴近孩子之后再把他拉上来。如果你和孩子相距甚远,孩子往往很难向你靠拢。
谨防“阴盛阳衰”
强化“男性教育”
问:现如今有些父亲把教育的责任推给妻子,自己却躲清闲。有的是因为工作太忙,没有时间管;有的是脾气不好,和孩子生不起气;有的则是干脆懒得管,觉得妻子承担教育孩子的责任是天经地义。您如何看待家庭教育中这种“阴盛阳衰”的现象?
关鸿羽:父亲是高山,母亲是大海,父母各有优势,必须做到阴阳互补,阴阳平衡,一定要防止家庭教育中“阴盛阳衰”的现象。
我曾经搞过一个调查,家庭教育中以母亲为主的占50%,以父亲为主的占20%,平分秋色的占30%。自古“养不教,父之过”,父亲放弃教育子女的责任是极大的错误。夫妻在教育孩子的问题上必须要一致,双方都主动教育子女,孩子才会感到爸爸妈妈对自己都很上心,才不敢钻空子。
从婴儿时期的喂养到幼儿园、小学、初中阶段的学校教育,我们的孩子现在受到母性教育已经够多了。如果在家里父亲再放弃教育的责任,孩子从小到大受到的是一系列的女性教育,哪还会有阳刚之气?如果孩子缺少男性教育,孩子的性格、情感、意志都会受到一定的影响。
淡化教育痕迹
做到不教而教
问:家长们总是期待着教诲能够立竿见影,却往往事与愿违。这种急于求成的心态是否也是导致亲子关系紧张的重要原因呢?
关鸿羽:家长要切记“三分教诲,七分等待”。三分教诲,指教诲要适量。说教过多,孩子会产生逆反心理,效果反而不好。七分等待,是指父母对孩子要有耐心。如果急躁,便会与孩子产生矛盾。教育有时需要等待,需要孩子亲身体验,甚至需要走些弯路,摔几个跟头。孩子成人成才,更需时日和世事的打磨,绝不可能一蹴而就。揠苗助长,只能得不偿失。
家长和孩子沟通时应该有耐心,谈话后不要急于让孩子表态,要让孩子回去想一想。当时马上表态、认错往往是假的。经过思想的矛盾斗争,才会有真正的认识。
问:“不教而教”这种说法最早是由您提出来的,您是否可以详细阐述一下这一概念?
关鸿羽:这正是我还要强调的一点。最好的教育不是耳提面命,不是批评斥责,不是强制惩罚,而是淡化教育痕迹,让受教育者在没有察觉的情况下被潜移默化。不教而教,就是把教育内容渗透在游戏、谈天、生活之中,在一种和谐、自然的气氛中使孩子不知不觉地接受教育。(韩璐)


Sharing is caring

Monday, March 5, 2012

阅读障碍须及早诊断‧适当课程助掌握读写技巧

《心中的小星星》

曾代表印度角逐奧斯卡最佳外語片的電影《心中的小星星》,小男主角在學習的過程中總是無法掌握許多相似文字的確實寫法,功課重複犯下同樣的錯誤,而身邊的師長卻誤以為是孩子懶惰、不肯認真學習所致。

電影中的小男主角無法同時執行多個指示、無法分辨相近的文字、功課總是犯下同樣的錯誤、專注力不強、無法好好唸書,甚至連結領帶、綁鞋帶的小事都無法掌握好。

然而,面對這種狀況的孩子,難道真的是如電影中被師長標籤成懶惰、不用功的孩子嗎?
大馬閱讀障礙協會主席沙里雅(圖:星洲日報)
大馬閱讀障礙協會主席沙里雅指出,在自閉症等多種學習障礙中,患有閱讀障礙的比例最高,平均每20人當中,就有1個孩子患有閱讀障礙,因此及早診斷是非常重要的。

學術表現與一般能力不符
10%孩童有閱讀障礙

閱讀障礙是種“隱藏”的學習障礙,患有此學習障礙的孩子外表看起來無異,惟會在沒有明顯的原因下面對閱讀、書寫或數學的困難。

簡單來說,他們在學術上的表現與一般能力(general ability)不符。

閱讀障礙的英文字母Dyslexia,是在1887年被一名德國醫生所創造出來,是由兩個希臘文字所組成,即Dys(困難的意思)與L e x i a(文字的使用)。

研究顯示,約有10%達致上學年紀的孩童面對閱讀障礙,當中約4%的情況比較嚴重,導致他們無法應付一般上課所需。

適當協助患者能掌握讀寫
一個人可能面對輕微、中等或嚴重等不同程度的閱讀障礙,而且他們也都顯現各自不同的症狀。

比方說,一個患有閱讀障礙症狀的孩子可能在閱讀上有不錯的表現,但卻在掌握拼音或表達意見上碰上困難。

另一種情況則是可以流利對談卻無法掌握閱讀。

每名患有此病症者都擁有其個人的困難與障礙,無論如何,只要給予適當的協助,大部份患有閱讀障礙的孩子都能掌握讀寫的技巧,甚至在學業上取得成功。

沙里雅指出,患有閱讀障礙的孩子可以很好地交談、在實踐上如音樂、畫畫、演唱、跳舞等都有很亮眼的表現,但卻可能出現因無法分辨相近的字母、讀音而無法好好地作記錄,專注力也無法持久、記憶力短等。

“一些相近的字母,如b和d、p和q、m和w等,孩子無法在書寫時分辨出個中的不同而重複出現錯誤。”

拼寫文字出現回文構詞法
此外,沙里雅說,患有閱讀障礙的孩子也會在拼寫文字時出現回文構詞法(anagram)的現象,如把桌子的table寫成tabel、疲累的tired寫成tried、吃的eat寫成tea等。

無論如何,自退休後積極投入大馬閱讀障礙協會工作長達十多年的沙里雅強調,患有閱讀障礙的孩子並非殘障兒童,反之大部份都是很伶俐(smart)的孩子,只有少部份是學習進度較慢的(slow learners)。

運用創意與電腦教學
沙里雅表示,該協會非常希望能迎合所有孩子的需求,準備適當的課程讓他們學習,然後再重新回校上課。

“在閱讀障礙協會上課的孩子,每天上課4小時,並且也會適當地運用創意與電腦教學,讓孩子可以更快地吸收所學習的知識。”

初級的課程主要教導拼音、書寫、形狀等各種字母的掌握;中級的課程的孩子慢慢學習組成文字,而最後階段的課程則是掌握閱讀與造句的能力。

她說,一旦孩子都掌握讀寫與閱讀的能力,就會把他們送回正規的學校,與其他普通的孩子上課。

大馬閱讀障礙協會自1999年成立以來,目前在全國擁有9間會所,包括雪隆一帶有4間,怡保、檳城、浮羅交怡、關丹與柔佛州都各擁有一間。

家長須陪伴孩子學習
每天奔波於不同地點的閱讀障礙協會會所的沙里雅指出,全國9間會所共有約250名孩子上課及35名教師。

“基於孩子人數眾多,因此都分成上、下午班制進行3個月的課程。待一個階段結束後再迎來第二批等待參加課程的孩子。”

她強調,讓孩子花費3個月時間參加課程,總比一輩子面對學習問題來得好,而且家長也必須參與,陪伴孩子一同學習與成長。

政府與該協會配合鑑定患有閱讀障礙的學前孩童是好的第一步,未來沙里雅更希望能做到每間學校,特別是小學都擁有針對閱讀障礙學校而設的班級。




鑒定閱讀障礙兒童措施
莎麗扎:今年杪前落實

不久前,婦女、家庭及社會發展部長拿督斯里莎麗扎指出,該部將與馬來西亞閱讀障礙協會合作,將於今年杪之前在國內所有社會福利局的幼兒園,落實鑒定閱讀障礙兒童的措施。

對於此事,沙里雅希望此計劃能儘快開始進行,同時也能藉此提高家長對閱讀障礙的醒覺與認識,畢竟越早鑑定病症,所引發的問題也越少,同時也更能及時獲得糾正。

大馬閱讀障礙協會在3個月的課程內結合科技,讓學生利用電腦學習。(圖:星洲日報)
依評估提供3個月課程
她說,大馬閱讀障礙協會的評估主要是在教育方面,鑑定孩子的閱讀、書寫、拼音、對話等的能力,再依據不同的程度被編排到不同的班級內。

“先為孩子進行檢驗是很重要的,那我們才會知道要以甚麼方式或教材教導,否則孩子很容易感到沉悶。”

沙里雅指出,大馬閱讀障礙協會提供的3個月課程,被分成初級、中級與高級,而教學策略一定要依據評估的結果。

不過,對於不確定孩子是否患有閱讀障礙的父母,一定要先攜帶孩子給專科醫生鑑定,再到協會來預約進行評估。


關於閱讀障礙

  • 最明顯的症狀就是在學習閱讀時面對意想不到的困難。
  • 閱讀障礙不只是一種閱讀問題,而是一種綜合症狀(syndrome),問題包括閱讀、拼音、發音、文字記憶(交談、書寫或記住文字的秩序)
  • 閱讀障礙是一個特殊的學習障礙,只影響一方面的學習,而且只是局限於特殊的神經系統。閱讀障礙與智障兒童是完全不同的。
  • 患有閱讀障礙的兒童在其他方面的發展並未受到影響,同時還會在某些方面,如繪畫、音樂、運動等擁有過人的表現。此外,他們的思考模式也非常具有創意。
閱讀障礙的症狀

  • 對扣緊外套、綁緊鞋帶與打領帶有困難。
  • 鞋子常左右調轉,而且似乎不會感覺不舒服。
  • 顯得笨拙、有易於造成意外的舉止。
  • 有跳躍或單足跳的困難。
  • 對拋球、接球與踢球的掌握不好。
  • 對與方向有關的陳述有理解的困難,如內外、上下、上面與下方、向前與退後。
  • 無法在同一個時間完成超過一個指示。
  • 言語發展上可能有不同。
  • 出現首音誤值(spoonerism)的情形,如停車場的“carpark”說成“par car”、把雞蛋與燻肉的“egg and bacon”說成“bag and acorn”。
  • 對多音節文字的發音有困難,如把醫院的“hospital”念成“hopsital”。
  • 對確認物品名稱有困難。
  • 對左、右感到混淆。
  • 出現許多書寫上的錯誤與拼音。
  • 無法正確抄寫,特別是抄寫黑板上的文字。
  • 對記住今天是星期幾、生日、地址或電話號碼的能力不佳。
  • 難以掌握告知別人正確的時間。
  • 對昨天與明天感到混淆。
  • 無法記住任何連續性的東西,如一星期的排序、月份或複數的東西。
  • 對閱讀、聲學(phonic)、說話感到困難。
  • 在專注學習後容易感到疲累,而且專注的效果往往不佳。
(星洲日報/大都會‧報導:林麗悅)


Sharing is caring

Copyright© All Rights Reserved sjkchwananselekoh.blogspot.com